|
Features
Index Page
Equipment Profile
Guest Column
Forest Management
Innovative Harvesting
Log Handling
BC Coastal Logging
Spotlight
Lumber Research
Private
Woodlands
Safety
in the Forest
Sawmill Technology
Sawmilling1
Sawmilling2
----------------
Departments
TechUpdate
Calendar of Events
Reader Service
Supplier Newsline
Classified Ads
-----------------
Site Information
Contact List
Past Issues Archive
Join our Listserve
Search Our Site
---------------------
|
February 2004
LUMBER RESEARCH
Working with blue-stained wood

Research organization Forintek is
working with nature’s “blue tone,” evaluating blue-stained lumber
manufactured from mountain pine beetle-affected timber for strength,
treatability, gluing and finishing.
By Sean Goldie
As
nature’s true building material, wood is both strong and aesthetically
pleasing. However, by virtue of being a natural product, wood is also
subject to variability—unlike the deliberate consistency of a manufactured
product such as plastic. Variability in wood can be seen as the natural
colour differences within a single tree, or through varying
susceptibilities to biological attack by insects and disease. Insects
typically utilize trees for one of two purposes: for consumption (a food
item for termites) or for habitat.
The subject of habitat is of immense
interest in both British Columbia and Alberta where an infestation of the
mountain pine beetle has persisted for some years and, more recently, has
undergone an explosion of epidemic proportions. This attack represents a
significant volume of standing timber and shows no sign of slowing. As the
beetle’s name would suggest, it prefers pine—primarily mature lodgepole
pine, but other species, including western white pine and limber pine, are
also attacked by the beetle. The beetle carries a specific blue-stain
fungus which it introduces into the tree. The insect carries these spores
on its body and deposits them under the protective bark, where they
quickly germinate. As the fungus grows into the wood it clogs the water
passages in the tree, interrupting the sap flow. Death of the tree follows
and the needles turn red.

These red-coloured trees are the most
visible evidence of mountain pine beetle attack. The fungus leaves a
blue-coloured stain in the sapwood of the tree. This blue stain not only
detracts from the aesthetic value of the wood when it is sawn, but may
also diminish the commercial value of the timber. The current approach to
stemming the extent of blue-stain damage to wood is to harvest the
affected trees as quickly as possible and to process them into dried
lumber with a moisture content (MC) of 19 per cent or less. This practice
and the continued maintenance of the lumber’s low moisture level will
virtually eliminate any further staining. However, the bluish hue will
persist in the products.
Consumer Confusion
The large volume of affected timber has resulted in more stained lumber
and processed wood products reaching the marketplace which in turn has
caused consumer confusion. Although blue-stain is not a mould, consumers
are concerned over the effect mould has on human health, especially in
enclosed environments. Some large retailers, particularly in the US, are
requesting stain-free lumber—avoiding the issue altogether. Although
inaccurate, the consumer perceives blue-stain to be a mould, particularly
as it appears bluish-black, and distinguishing between blue-stain and
mould can be challenging for the lay person. While some may view the
appearance of blue-stain negatively, others have successfully turned this
phenomenon into a marketing opportunity. “Denim Pine” (www.denimpine.ca
) has taken this unique feature and is setting up a process to market a
variety of blue-stained products such as flooring, paneling and furniture.
Is it Blue-Stain or Mould?
Fundamentally, the blue-stain fungus is contained within the wood cells,
whereas a mould occurs mainly on the surface where favourable conditions
such as acceptable moisture and temperature exist in order for mould to
grow. While in fact blue-stain is commonplace, users of blue-stained
lumber need the reassurance that this wood is substantially unchanged from
non-stained wood. Until Forintek Canada Corp (www.forintek.ca)
set out to investigate the performance characteristics of blue-stained
lumber, little work had been done to answer the concerns of consumers and
provide usable information to lumber manufacturers. Since 1979, Forintek
has been providing the Canadian wood products industry with technical
advice on manufacturing processes, research on new manufacturing
practices, products and equipment, and market research and information. As
Canada’s national wood products research institute, Forintek works closely
with industry to provide objective and scientific advice.
Tests for Strength, Treatability,
Gluing and Finishing
Anticipating the need for clarification, Forintek undertook the first
comprehensive study on the properties of wood infested by
beetle-transmitted blue-stain. The project examined two fundamental areas:
the impact on selected lumber strength characteristics and issues arising
from an anticipated increase in permeability. Past research into specific
varieties of blue-stain had indicated some influence on selected strength
properties, compared to non-stained wood. Some of this research, however,
was dated and perhaps not valid for the beetle-transmitted fungi found in
Western Canada.
Strength properties of wood are important
because if the physical properties of wood are compromised, structural
systems such as roof trusses and I-beams could be impacted. These systems
can have highly stressed members and, whether they were assembled using
glue and/or held together with mechanical connections, they must maintain
their structural integrity as safety is of primary importance. Increased
permeability was expected due to the manner in which the stain spreads
through the sapwood. An increase in permeability could influence such
activities as gluing, surface finishing and liquid absorption during
preservative treatment. The study collected ordinary “mill run” lumber
samples from sawmills located in British Columbia’s Interior. Samples of
lodgepole pine that displayed typical blue-stain characteristics were
prepared using standardized test procedures under such variables as
moisture content, physical sample geometry and size, and grain
orientation.
Strength Unaffected by Blue-Stain
A variety of tests were chosen to detect changes in the mechanical
performance of lumber resulting from the blue-stain. Small clear samples
were used to remove variables that would otherwise be introduced by the
use of full-sized pieces. One test compared the relative performance of
blue-stained to non-stained lumber, as it related to the holding capacity
of truss connector plates loaded in tension. The results indicated a
comparable truss plate grip capacity between the two groups. Further tests
on Modulus of Rupture (MOR) and Modulus of Elasticity (MOE), found
comparable results between both blue-stained and non-stained samples.
No Impact on Treatability
Blue-stained wood is more permeable than non-stained wood. In general,
successful preservative treatment consists of two conditions being met.
The first condition is that an appropriate amount of chemical is absorbed,
as outlined by industry standards. The second condition is that the
chemical be deposited in the appropriate location within the lumber.
Researchers investigated the liquid uptake of such products as chromated
copper arsenate (CCA) to understand the consequences of excess absorption.
Although this preservative is being phased out for certain uses, the
results seen would apply to alternative preservatives. Over-absorption not
only incurs additional cost but also may not result in any additional
benefits. Some tree species do not absorb liquids as well as others and
are referred to as “refractory.” Lodgepole pine is a refractory species in
that its heartwood does not absorb chemicals very well. Since blue-stain
cultivates and spreads in the sapwood, any enhanced absorption would be
restricted to this area and not within the adjoining heartwood.
Gluing Bond Strength Unaffected
With increased permeability, the question of possible side-effects on
adhesive bond quality and surface finishes was investigated. Laminated
wood products represent a significant value-added opportunity—one that is
dependent on the ability of the component surfaces to successfully
interact with adhesives and finishes. The use of adhesives depends on the
product’s end use either in non-structural or structural applications.
Non-structural bonds were tested with a polyvinyl acetate (PVA) adhesive
formulated for radio frequency (RF) drying, while structural bonds were
tested using phenol resorcinol formaldehyde (PRF). During the study of
adhesive properties, the dried lodgepole pine samples were assembled into
test panels having blue-stain-to-blue-stain and non-stained-to-non-stained
joints. Both adhesives types were subjected to a standardized vacuum
pressure delamination test to investigate any resulting open gluelines. An
assessment of bond quality was then carried out using the block shear test
(BST). Both tests showed the integrity of the glue joint was unaffected
when blue-stained-to-blue-stained wood was glued together.
Finishing Blue-Stained Wood Adds to
its Unique Appeal
The finishing test was designed to determine what single finish or
combination of finishes could be applied to either complement or
de-emphasize the unique colouring. Emphasis was placed on non-paint
finishes suitable for residential furniture. As this is a subjective area,
there were no test protocols available that could quantify the aesthetic
value. A number of different stains/toners were applied, either separately
or in combination, followed with a clear sealer. These finishes were then
tested for surface adhesion using standardized protocols. The results
showed that, blue-stained or not, both samples had comparable finish
adhesion qualities. In total, thirty different surface treatments were
investigated, resulting in suggested combinations of colours and finishes
for either enhancing or minimizing the appearance of the blue-stain. In
general, tints that successfully masked the phenomenon were combinations
of reddish, bluish or charcoal tones. The appearance of blue-stained wood
could be enhanced or highlighted using simple standard clear furniture
finishes.
For Further Information:
For more details on mountain pine beetle or beetle-transmitted blue-stain,
or for additional technical information, please contact a Forintek
Industry Advisor (e-mail:
lumber@van.forintek.ca ) or visit Forintek online:
http://www.forintek.ca ,
http://www.durable-wood.com/publications/index.php (select the
publication entitled “Properties of Lumber with Beetle-Transmitted
Blue-Stain”).
Sean Goldie is a Vancouver-based
consultant in the forest sector. He may be contacted by tel/fax: (604)
266-3254 or e-mail: sgoldie@telus.net.
|
Conclusion: Blue-stained lumber exhibits
same characteristics as non-stained lumber |
|
Forintek conducted the study on
blue-stained lumber to provide timely objective research on the effects of
blue-stain on common wood performance characteristics. With higher volumes
of blue-stained products entering the marketplace, it was important to
provide sound scientific advice to manufacturers and consumers. Samples
from both blue-stained and non-stained wood yielded similar findings.
Blue-stained lumber continued to exhibit the same strength, fastening,
gluing and finishing characteristics as non-blue-stained lumber. For
manufacturers intent on finishing blue-stained lumber with a stain, a
variety of techniques can be used. Depending on the desired end effect,
colour contrasts between blue-stain and non-blue-stained lumber can be
de-emphasized or enhanced with standard furniture finishes. While working
with and marketing blue-stained lumber poses some challenges, the
underlying message is that the performance characteristics of blue-stained
lumber are not significantly different than those of non-stained lumber. |
|
This
service is temporarily unavailable |
|