|
December 2003 January 2004 Guest Column How to make the move to cut-to-length equipment By Tim White Logging contractors and the management at forest companies are used to making important business decisions. Every day, they make decisions that will determine the direction and, ultimately, the success of their operations. A decision that many contractors are increasingly facing is making the switch to cut-to-length (CTL) equipment from conventional logging equipment. This move, which involves a significant investment in equipment and big changes in overall operations, can be made successfully if it is thought through and planned out properly. For most contractors, when we talk about making the switch, they are going from a full tree-length logging system—with a feller buncher, skidders and delimber—to CTL, which consists of a harvester and forwarder. Less equipment is required with a CTL
system, but that does not mean it is a simple system to operate and
manage. CTL set-ups bring their own challenges—though they are manageable
challenges. In my opinion, you need the right mix of only three things for
a successful cut-to-length operation: trees, machines and people. On the
equipment side, there are several important items to consider: This is a major business decision for a
contractor, with over a $1 million investment in the machines alone. A
strong business—not social—relationship needs to be in place with your
equipment supplier. To put it bluntly, friendships and history are
important, but that’s on the weekend at the barbecues. Contractors need to
develop a business partnership to succeed. Some key factors to be
considered in choosing your CTL equipment supplier: In 1976, I was running a
harvester/forwarder CTL system in New Brunswick which was delivering 76
trees, or 13.2 cubic metres, per productive machine hour back then. These
are pretty good numbers, even by today’s standards. Today, equipment
manufacturers have not improved production capabilities much, but they
have improved mechanical reliability, machine operability and product
support to deliver better machine availability results. When it comes down
to choosing your machine brand, there are some key factors to consider:
Tracked machines offer reliability,
simplicity of servicing, proven carriers, and the power to handle big CTL
heads. There are limitations, too, to each type of harvester. Rubber-tired
machines may have limits on cutting head weight and size, while the
tracked machines may not offer optimum tail swing and have limitations in
rocky ground. There are also obviously factors that affect production with
forwarders. The most to least critical factors here would be: The time spent loading and unloading the forwarder represents from 50 to 80 per cent of the total work cycle time, depending on the forwarding distance. I’ll talk more about what to look for in forwarders and harvesters in this column in the next issue of Logging & Sawmilling Journal. Tim White of White Forestry & Associates is a forest industry consultant. He has been involved with forest harvesting equipment for more than 30 years, 20 years of that with a major logging equipment manufacturer. He can be reached at tim.j.white@sympatico.ca or (519) 421-5469.
|
||
|
This page and all contents
©1996-2007 Logging and Sawmilling
Journal (L&S J) and TimberWest Journal. This page
last modified on
Tuesday, September 28, 2004 |
|||